Bill Wallace wrote:
>True, and thus progress is slowed.
But only slowed by a couple of years, I would estimate.
ZPE wrote:
>>Our gamble is that several potential investors will realize the =
advantages
>>of being the FIRST company to market a working F/E technology. While
>>"waiting" to "buy it at the store" will eventually benefit everyone, =
leading
>>the F/E marketing industry during a time when no real competition =
exists
>>stands to make a "few more dollars" than what "waiting" would produce.
>><grin> 8^)
Bill Wallace wrote:
>If what you have is true though, and I were a huge corporation, I would =
use
>every dirty trick in the book to get it from you , ever read the story =
on
>how microsoft with windows CE beat up on the little guys that had the
>vision? You tread dangerous waters. I think you know this though and =
are
>counting on that.
I wouldn't say that we're "counting on it", however, we know the risks =
which is why we haven't gone public with our search for funding before =
now. We are now ready to deal with the risks since we are now ready to =
"give it away" if we have to.... emphasis on "if we have to".
ZPE wrote:
>>Also, if a potential investor decides to "wait" for the Oct 28th
>>disclosure, he runs the risk that we WILL establish solid funding =
contacts
>>which would mean public disclosure will never happen.
Bill Wallace wrote:
>Exactly what I predict you will say, wether you get it or not, hope you =
can
>prove me wrong. You have pursued it for the wrong goals and no matter =
what
>precautions you think you may have taken anything can be outmaneuvered =
save
>a quick release to millions of people worldwide simulataneously. Free
>energy should not be pursued for money, too many people can be helped =
by it,
>you involve greed into something so revolutionary it only hurts us all.
Although public disclosure BY US would not happen if a funding source =
was established, in a couple of years when we begin to market the =
technology, this will be just as good as a public disclosure since the =
technology would be available to all. True, it would not be as quickly =
as everyone would like but we are emphatic about making sure we have at =
least tried to help those we believe deserve it the most, and the only =
way we can do that is to be the first to market it. If it's not meant =
to be, then it won't happen that way. Yet, if it does happen the way we =
are trying to make it happen, then... it was meant to be.
We are not pursuing free energy for money (to become selfishly rich). =
We are pursuing it, ultimately for all mankind, but only after we have =
had a shot at trying to help certain causes. This is NOT the wrong =
goal. The only wrong goal would be any selfish reasons. We have none! =
In the end (near future) everyone WILL be helped by it. Supression =
attempts from any source will definitely fail because we have seen to =
it!
Best Wishes,
ZPE
http://freeweb.pdq.net/zpe