I was lead to these test not knowing of Avramenko's plug even though most of
my test were very close to his except I used one diode and a pulsed DC, What I
first found was that if you have a wire from a charged piece of metal from the
above transformer and attached a wire going to a meter and the other wire
going back to that charged metal, I found that current flowed when one of the
wires was rubbed on the metal, so both wires were attached to the same metal
but one is in motion along the surface.
In all cases current direction was totally independent of applied polarity.
John Berry
John Berry wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your following message has been delivered to the 307 members of
> the list KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net at 05:58:41 on 29 Mar 1999.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Well I'm trying to decide if I really find this funny, I do think that a
> device somewhat like described could work, well I thought some things
> were written a bit oddly.
>
> Well hear was what I wrote:
>
> Good, this is nice to hear!
>
> This is interesting as I put a single wire from a transformer
> (internally rectified to PDC) and connected it to a micro amp meter and
> a diode in parallel, I tried many setups and verified that the current
> read in the microamp reader was not coming through the one wire by any
> means, In fact the current appeared because of the diode and the
> asymmetry it created, it was very similar indeed a variant of the
> alvagardo plug though I did not know of it at the time, I never measured
> the voltage.
> The energy though only in microamps was never the less very real and the
> main point seemed to be that it did not drain the energy input so that
> more could be attached, adding more diodes in series did nothing but
> adding more micrometers would have, but alas I would have to buy many
> microamp meters to do it so I kept it in the back of my mind, if the
> right coil was found the energy from this could be much greater.
>
> I suggest that the device (not knowing exactly what it is) would work
> better with an asymmetric HV biased waves, The other thing is to make
> larger coils, I don't however know how the circuit works, my only other
> suggestion is adding a caduceus wound torus.
>
> Well I'm glad that there are people trying things and getting good
> results
>
> John Berry
>
> "Jerry W. Decker" wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks!
> >
> > Well, get your books out, clean off that workbench and scrounge up
> > $20.00 to build your own working F/E circuit, check out;
> >
> > http://www.keelynet.com/main.htm
> >
> > --
> > Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> > http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> > Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> > KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------