Now, now, let's not throw the baby out with the
bathwater....this isn't a hard and fast O/U claim and
has lots of room for error seeing as how it is
radionics.
As I understand his diagram and explanation, he
basically sends a frequency pattern of EM bursts into
the printer output which broadcasts into an EM field.
As with all radionics, it is HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE so how
do you know if the signal being broadcast will do what
you intended?
The only way I know of is to monitor for deviations
from the norm OR some major change that had little
likelihood of happening.
I've spoken with Bob Dratch and communicated via emails
several times and he is a bit secretive on his devices,
but he does sell them to test if you'd like to buy
one....business and all that...
Same with the Harmonic Health system that uses a
radionics attachment to the computer...that kind of
'equipment' would be hardware and software but what are
the effects and can they be reliably reproduced.....
But I'd certainly not give up on it just because an
inventor won't give up the details of how to build
it...if it makes sense, its great to add to your
worldview hoping for a correlation that will lead to a
future experiment...
--- Mother wrote:
>
>
> > Martin said
> >A while back there was some discussion of the
> virtual Godbox radionic
> >programme. I would like to know if anyone has tried
> this programme and what
> >results they got.
> >
>
> >
> I had ask the inventor for permission to do a
> legitimate scientific study
> using double-blind methods on subjects and to verify
> frequency transfer or
> structural domain changes within aqueous solution
> using IR. spectrograph,
> this study would have cost him nothing. He seems to
> have inventors disease
> and got all defensive an upset that anybody but him
> could dare understand,
> his New age mambo jumbo.
> As a side note the program is written in national
> instruments Lab View (an
> icon based programming language) it would be very
> easy to open the program
> up and see what is really going on.
> As he was unwilling to do anything but adhere to
> anecdotal claims, my
> conclusion is it is not worth pursuing
===
=================================
Please respond to jdecker@keelynet.com
as I am writing from my work email of
jwdatwork@yahoo.com.........thanks!
=================================
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com