Re: Animation

Ted Gallop ( gallope@planet.curtin.edu.au )
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:12:08

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: p-michel: "Ed McCabe"
Next message: Jerry W. Decker: "Commercial fuel cells ready for market?"
Maybe in reply to: James Bland: "Animation"

>From: Steve <steve@primeline.net>
>To: James Bland <chateaux@tinet.ie>
>Subject: Re: Animation
>
><complain>Yes, very nice animations... but not in emails!
>
>I'm usually the last person to complain about something like this,
>but my email is quite slow tonight because I was downloading the
>new Star Wars preview (26 megs). Here I thought it might be something
>important, but what was it? An animation. Here's some advice, if you
>want to make your emails more exciting, make a cool sig file...
>don't waste everyone's bandwidth with gif animations, ok?
>At least not people like me who don't have a T1 and unlimited net
>access....</complain>
>
>thanks.
>-Steve
>--
> steve@primeline.net | ICQ: 5113616
>Digital Fusion: http://www.darknet.net/fusion

I agree. I run an ordinary email package (Eudora lite) that lets me read
text.
My KeelyNet Digest takes ages to download and I end up with over a hundred
pages. 97% gobbledegook (coded pics I assume) and 3% readable content. Why
burden others with huge amounts of junk they can't read or see!!

Ted Gallop

Previous message: p-michel: "Ed McCabe"
Next message: Jerry W. Decker: "Commercial fuel cells ready for market?"
Maybe in reply to: James Bland: "Animation"