Re: Electrostatic Power Generating System

Ken Carrigan ( (no email) )
Sun, 14 Mar 1999 15:21:51 -0500

Well, check my web page out and there are equations for some proofs
using magnetic fields and copper/metal disks to generate some interesting
results. There is some errors in my assumptions but 80% of what I wrote
is correct. The assumptions for loss is what is off. But it shows that
velocity
and B-Fields are a part of the equations as the diameter is also part of it.

Good luck,
v/r Ken Carrigan

>Question for Ken Carrigan.
>Did you down load the Sullos file? I have had only one response from him
>but will try once again to find out how much current his high voltage
>generator takes. When I re read some of Bearden's file, I get the
>impression that this Sullos guy has something to take note of. He states
>that when a voltage limit has been reached, a magnetic field will work in
>opposition to the normal Lenz law rule and should be exploytable for anti
>gravity effects.
>I believe Hamel's experiments work the other way. By spinning magnets over
>certain limits, high voltages are obtainable which of course can be stepped
>down to usable levels. So these two experimenters work on the same thing
>but from opposite camps.
>One of the main ingredients of the Testika Static electricity reducer are
>the horse shoe magnets wound in various ways but with 4 sandwiches of
>aluminium
>plexiglass and copperplates.
>I think that these are in the position they are in to maintain the motive
>power once set in motion as each sandwich is maintaining a voltage potential
>which would react with the remaining static charge on the rim of the discs
>after passing the collectors.The reducing from high voltage potential to
>lower higher current potential is accomplished by the coils inside the
>Leyden jars.
>I have found various descriptions of the workings in a schematic form but
>no one so far has produced and exact formula as this is obviously a guarded
>secret with as many guesses as people experimenting.
>I was rather intrigued by the pre conference statement that Mr.Hamel has
>the answer to mechanically minded people to be self sufficient in energy
>and am waiting with baited braith the outcome as I am desperately in need
>of free energy in the location where I live.
>
>Another matter altogether.
>I hear all sorts of alarming messages regarding y2K. Even our Government is
>circulating warning messages so tried my computer.
>Put the clock on 31st of December 1999 23.59p.m.and hey presto it rolled over
>nicely stating 1st of January year 2000
>So tried some other functions which also worked by rolling over to
>2001,2002 and 2003 etc.
>Mycomputer is a 486 120 megahertz etc.
>Does this mean it is compliant?
>
>Greetings from down under.
>Going slowly crazy,my spacebar giving up the ghost and have to correct
>every sentence.
>
>Ren
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>