Re: New tool

Harvey Norris ( (no email) )
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 23:10:18 PST

On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:08:25 -0800, LARRY SULLIVAN wrote:

> Humm;
> I could be barking up the wrong tree here but could this be applicable
> as to the tuner circuit as in the Telsa generator. I have the notion of
> building a field collector generator, it would be nice to get a wide
> enough frequency range and stong enough inducer circuit to make it
> practicle. I have looked at Telsa's generators as good candidaties for
> the experiment.
>>Bark Bark; nonsensible notions only indicate the confusion abounding.
nobody knows what you are talking about. A field collector: enough frequency
range; strong enough inducer; this is all just rubbish to ever be
practically practicle. Or maybe I need to take a course on practicle
physics. HDN
> Larry
> Wm Perry wrote:
> >
> > I have just recently acquired an audio signal generator which covers
> > from 20Hz-200KHz. I hope to find a suitable use for it. I will have to
> > buy (or build) an amp to boost the output signal because it is a
> > generator used to troubleshoot electronic gear. Any ideas for it?
> > BillP
> >> Thats okay bill because I just got my signal generator out to day and
was cussin cause the lowest frequency it will give me is 100 K. I failed to
realize until this postage this that my fancy do dad of a expensive signal
generator is a rf generator and that I can probably secure a 5000 hz signal
without wondering too much more if it is possible. my practical use for this
signal is to send it into a nine mile length coil to produce an electrical
standing wave. HDN
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/