Re: 1/2L[I]2=1/2C[V]2

Harvey Norris ( (no email) )
Sat, 30 Jan 1999 17:03:15 PST

On Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:55:56 -2, Marcelo Puhl wrote:

> > To reiterate I use the term unobvious potential to mean the
MIDPOINT of a
> > series resonant circuit. If two of these circuits are made one can be
made
> > backwards or 180 degrees out of phase with the other simply by hooking
them up
> > BACKWARDS with respect to the wall connections. I have seen a lot of
blank
> > stares and total misunderstanding of this term "180 degrees out of
phase" Its
> > so simple that it is rediculous that people read something into it like
its
> > some kind of mystical thing that cant be understood. What needs to be
> > understood is that when two of these backwards phases are made when one
has an
> > unobvious compression of electrons, or acts like an unobvious negative
source,
> > the other opposite phase will create an unobvious vacuum of electrons
or
> > unobvious positive source. The reaction of these unobvious potentials by
use
> > of an arc gap is a superb method of creating a clean high frequency
> > oscillation between resonances,which I refer to as the binary resonant
arc
> > gap.
>
> I understood your idea, and I like it. But I guess you could provide a
circuit
> drawing for better understanding of it.
>
>
> > Having lost my train of thought lets return to the equation.When
the
> > amperage in this coil example is increased 15 fold to 75mA the energy
stored
> > in the magnetic field is exponentially increased due to amperage term I
being
> > squared on the left term. For the same energy to exist in the capacitor
the V
> > term must correspondingly be increased 15 fold. In a way this simple
equation
> > explains the series resonant rise of voltage. Now the heating loss in
this
> > example is 5.625 watts from the average current of .075 A and 1000 ohms.
Is it
> > remarkable that the energy stored by 1/2L[I]2 is by the left term
..1575
> > joules? That being the case the energy transfer of .1575 joules 120
times per
> > second would then be 18.9 joules per second or 18.9 watts. If it were
possible
> > to tap into this energy transfer without diminishing the quantity being
> > transferred than we should suppose that overunity is possible,shouldnt
we? HDN
> >
>
> What if you put a transformer connected in series with your ark gap to
take
> advantage of that "doubled current" ?
>
>
> ---
> Marcelo Puhl
> mark@plug-in.com.br
>

_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/