I did not know that there were 'paid debunkers' but it makes sense that there
would be... the perils you describe about seeking an audience on the net certainly
sounds reasonable. However, regardless of these difficulties it does seem
apparent that powerful ideas or methods that actually work and provide benefit
can certainly attract an audience significant enough to propel them into the
minds of the masses, even if they occupy only the nooks and crannies of social
awareness. I use the Rife example again, only because it seems to be such a
powerful archetype of this phenomenon of dispersing meaningful 'underground'
information.
I suspect Keelynet was at the forefront of bringing this info to the public
via electronic media but since then the availability of Rife related information
has grown exponentially by leaps and bounds. Here is an example of such revolutionary
information transcending all boundaries and obstacles placed before it even
the legendary might of Morris Fishbein was incapable of squelching it. Rife technology
is certainly tatamount to an equivalent magnitude of importance in the displine
of medical and health related sciences as free energy would be to physics and
energy related disciplines. I suspect that should an equivalent 'free energy'
functioning model ever be released in the same venue that Rife technology was,
it too would find a perpetually growing and supportive group among the grass roots
partisans who seek freedom from the 'system'. And like the Rife, its supporters
and developers would also grow exponentially.
J. Snell wrote:
>
> donadams wrote:
> >
> > Charles, like Bradley you expressed so many of my thoughts much, much better
> > than I could have...
>
> [ SNIP ]
>
> > > > As Moray B. King and many others have pointed out, the only way to
> > > > change the paradigm and gain acceptance of "free energy" is to widely
> > > > broadcast the information for a simple, repeatable experiment.
> > > >
> > > > And with Internet technology, this can be done planet wide in a flash.
> > > >
> > > > Charles
>
> Try this for yourself with something before making this assumption. On
> most occasions people will simply shout "crackpot" and then ignore any
> further attempts you might make.
> Using the newsgroups is almost worthless. There are well paid debunkers
> that troll the groups and pounce on anything unusual. They have great
> staying power and will usually outlast any arguement you may engage in.
> After all, they are being paid to stay right there and monitor things.
> You have to take time out for work and such. They are already at work.
> They are there to take away chances for proper exposure of ideas.
> They're there to keep newbies from taking up your cause. They have a
> very high rate of success. I know this from experience. The NG's are a
> tough audience.
> As for the WWW, If someone isn't already looking for what you've got,
> they probably won't see it and therefore won't bend an ear to it.
> Good luck, in any case, should you choose to try for "global exposure".
>
> Sincerely,
>
> J. Snell