Thanks for your rather good article on weather ingeneering. I also witness
the magnet box at work and have seen some of Mr Constable videos
productions on the subject. So I have no doubt about the phenomenon. Also
a friend of mine related an experiment made using one of Peter Kelly's
radionic device (the gray analyzer). It went something like this; a big
weather system was forcasted and was entering the province of Quebec. But
fair weather was needed to complete a some construction work (a roof was
being redone if memory serves well). A polaroid picture of a map of Quebec
was put in the well of the machine and some rates were dowsed for dry
weather. Once the rates started to be broadcasted the weather system
litterally turned at more the right angle and went around the province of
Quebec. From heavy rains broadcasted to hardly any cloud seen in the sky,
the coincidence was apparently too hard an explanation for the phenomenon.
Mathias
Jerry W. Decker wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> Here is something interesting from Gary Vesperman about how aether and
> weather interact (I use AETHER as the spelling to indicate the original
> universal force that is distinct from the chemical ether and the
> erroneous etherIC name...>>> Jerry)
> ======================
>
> ETHERIC WEATHER ENGINEERING
>
> Etheric weather engineering is certainly one of the more
> spectacular products of the international "underground"
> science network. Unbelievable as it may seem, what looks
> like an ordinary tin can or handleless frying pan slowly
> being turned by an electric motor, in less than a half-hour,
> can cause heavy rain within 10 miles under conditions of
> high barometric pressure. (I have a video which shows about
> 20 demonstrations of etheric rain making.) I personally
> have seen etheric weather engineering effects at least
> twice in Las Vegas and once in the Midwest.
>
> So what is the secret of this crazy thing called "etheric
> weather engineering"? To begin understanding this most
> remarkable phenomena, we first take a look at just what
> is the "ether":
>
> Sound comprises of oscillating waves traveling through
> water, air, and solid matter. Light propagates through
> space also as a wavelike phenomenon having frequency
> and wavelength. Over a century ago, some physicists
> postulated that light is a form of electromagnetism
> which travels as an oscillating wave through a medium
> they termed "ether".
>
> The famous Morley-Michelson experiment around that time
> determined that the speed of light is constant. So
> therefore, it was thought, there can not be an ether.
>
> Subsequently, physics was led on a wild goose chase. For
> example, the mathematics of Einstein's famous theories
> of relativity are mostly based on the assumption that
> the speed of light is constant.
>
> Astronomers commonly believe that the universe started
> with a big bang and is still expanding because the speed
> of light is thought to be constant.
>
> It has been claimed that the physics of electromagnetism
> and gravity as presently taught in academia has over 20
> serious flaws.
>
> Actual measurements with modern instruments have shown
> that the speed of light varies with both direction
> and time. (Morley and Michelson erred in measuring the
> speed of light with both interferometers in the
> horizontal plane. They should have instead placed
> one interferometer in the horizontal plane, i.e.,
> orthogonal to gravity, and the other interferometer
> in the vertical plane, i.e., parallel to gravity.)
>
> Actual measurements of the speed of light as it varies
> by as much as 5 miles per second over time show that
> the ether is not static but, as the earth travels
> through space, seems to surge and ebb with both time
> and orientation with respect to the stars.
>
> Contemporary physics does not answer some of the
> fundamental questions of magnetism and gravity.
>
> For example, just how do magnets attract and repel?
> What is gravity? How can magnets under specialized
> conditions produce anti-gravity? What is inertia?
>
> The consensus of some physicists is that two basic
> changes need to be made to the theory of physics.
>
> The speed of light is no longer to be assumed constant.
> The other change is that admitting the existence of
> the ether helps to explain many physical phenomena not
> otherwise satisfactorily explainable by conventional
> mainstream physics.
>
> For example, some physicists are now claiming that
> the earth's relatively weak gravitational "pull" is
> actually the ether pushing objects such as the moon,
> satellites, and people into the shadow formed by the
> earth on the ether.
>
> Etheric energy, also sometimes called "zero point
> electromagnetic radiation" and "vacuum field energy",
> is known as an energy that fills the fabric of all
> space.
>
> Technically, the etheric energy results from an electric
> flux which flows orthogonally to our perceived dimension
> or reality.
>
> The energy density of the ether is essentially
> incomprehensible. The mass equivalence of etheric energy
> has been calculated by physicists to be on the order
> of 1093 grams per cubic centimeter using Einstein's
> famous equation E = mc2.
>
> To put etheric energy density in perspective, Nobel
> Laureate Richard Feynman and one of Einstein's protégés,
> John Wheeler, have calculated that there is more than
> enough energy in the volume of a coffee cup to evaporate
> all the world's oceans! We fail to easily recognize
> this immense energy source as it is analogous to trying
> to weigh a beaker of water underneath the ocean's surface.
>
> Dan A. Davidson recently published a book "Shape Power:
> A Treatise on How Form Converts Universal Aether into
> Electromagnetic and Gravitic Forces and Related
> Discoveries in Gravitational Physics" reporting on his
> many years of measuring and studying the effects of the
> geometry of objects on the ether.
>
> In his book he explains how geometric forms, for example
> the famous "pyramid power", convert etheric energy
> into electromagnetic and gravitic forces.
>
> Etheric weather engineering researchers not only claim
> but have demonstrated many times that precisely machined
> metal objects similar in shape to cones, tin cans,
> handleless frying pans, etc., when slowly turned by
> an electric motor (but not simply rotated on the axis
> of their hollow interiors), bore holes in the ether and
> cause weather upsets and changes.
>
> Only by linking the enormously high energy density of the
> ether with etheric hole boring can the disproportionately
> immense leverage of small objects upon the weather be
> understood.
>
> The foregoing is referred to as "active" etheric weather
> engineering. There is also a "passive" form which generally
> comprises of a box about two feet high, wide, and deep.
>
> The tops, bottoms, and sides are about an inch or so thick
> and comprise of a thick layer of electrical insulation
> sandwiched between two thin layers of an electrically
> conductive material such as aluminum foil.
>
> Pieces of a wrecked RV camper's shell sometimes have been
> used.
>
> Along the four inside edges around the bottom of the box
> are four magnets. Each magnet is placed in the center of
> each edge.
>
> To make rain, the polarities of the magnets are set one
> way, and to cause fair weather, the magnets are reversed.
> (I have actually seen this demonstrated in the Midwest.)
>
> On the center of the bottom of the box is set a truncated
> concrete cone about a foot high and a little over a half-foot
> in diameter. The concrete contains some special materials
> including mono-atomic gold and is sometimes wetted.
>
> I stuck my head inside the box and could detect a faint
> mustiness. The experimenter thinks there is something like
> 20 megawatts of etheric power vertically streaming through
> the box.
>
> The weather control box is termed "passive" because it
> takes about a half-day for the weather to react in a large
> circle of several miles in radius as compared to the
> half-hour for several miles in radius of weather to react
> to the rotating metal objects.
>
> In the awesome demonstration of the weather control box I
> saw in the Midwest, an otherwise cloudless day went
> completely cloudy from horizon to horizon in about an hour,
> after a buildup of several hours in the morning. I could even
> see lines or bands in the clouds that were possibly caused
> by the horizontal aluminum sidings of the garage inside
> of which the weather control box was located.
>
> Then the magnets were reversed, and the clouds had dissipated
> by the end of the afternoon. I was overwhelmed by seeing,
> for the first time, etheric weather engineering. It was simply
> magnificent.
>
> It has been suggested that the precision of etheric
> weather engineering could possibly be increased by using
> both passive and active forms of etheric weather control
> in a mode of operation similar to alternately pressing
> the gas and brake pedals of a vehicle.
>
> Some of America's Indian tribes were able to break up
> droughts by dancing counter-clockwise around a circle,
> or to stop rain by dancing clockwise around a circle.
>
> To illustrate, the summer of 1931 Nevada was suffering
> through a drought. An elderly Shoshone Indian, Wagon Jack,
> suggested to the tribal members living in the vicinity
> of Austin, Nevada that they devote some time to a rain
> dance. With considerable skepticism, Indians from all
> over central Nevada showed up beginning August 14 for
> continuous rain dancing plus of course feasting and
> political meetings.
>
> On August 19, the skies clouded over and rain began coming
> down in torrents. After four days of heavy rainfall, flooding
> caused extensive damage. (Nevada Historical Society)
>
> I remember reading another story where during a severe
> two-year California drought during the mid-1970's, an
> environmental group in San Francisco just for fun decided
> to hold a rain dance.
>
> They had to cut it short because it started raining!
> Of course, I didn't understood then what was really happening
> and why.
>
> Etheric weather engineering researcher Trevor James Constable
> has produced a video "Etheric Weather Engineering" on his
> weather engineering experiments. Thomas J. Brown has authored
> a book on etheric weather engineering titled "Loom of the
> Future: The Weather Engineering Work of Trevor James Constable".
>
> It was reported in Brown's book that in September 1994,
> Hurricane Iniki was bearing down on Honolulu. Constable's
> ship happened to be located between the hurricane and
> Honolulu so he was able to divert Iniki. Unfortunately,
> the hurricane ended up damaging the island of Kauai instead.
>
> Installing local etheric weather engineering capabilities,
> probably under contract to an etheric weather engineering
> researcher, should be a relatively trivial expense.
>
> One weather control machine or box should be able to cover
> the entire resort area. By being able to cause rain or sun
> on demand, the Guatemala resort project could achieve a
> competitive advantage.
>
> I do not know whether local weather control, set to sun,
> would be sufficient to break up a hurricane should one
> approach the resort complex. It is possible that weather
> control machines would have to be installed on ships or
> planes and located in the path of the hurricane such as
> happened with Iniki. Being able to break up or at least
> divert hurricanes should noticeably reduce insurance costs.
>
> (End of chapter on etheric weather engineering)
>
> Please notice that in my above write-up, Trevor Constable
> in his book and etheric weather engineering videotape demo,
> and Jerry's above explanation of opening and draining ether
> holes, no reference is made to the density of the ether
> itself.
>
> Take another look at my sentence "The mass equivalence of
> etheric energy has been calculated by physicists to be on
> the order of 1093 grams per cubic centimeter using Einstein's
> famous equation E = mc2."
>
> I find it hard to believe that puny devices such as Constable's
> handleless metal pans, cones, handleless coffee mugs, etc.,
> can locally change etheric density and cause rain within 10 miles.
>
> It would be comparable to noticeably changing, for example,
> the level of Lake Superior by dipping out a teaspoon of water.
>
> But, if the theory is correct, and Dan Davidson has amply
> provided proof, if his experimental results can be correctly
> interpreted in this manner, then we have to assume that an
> atom has a huge, huge interaction with the surrounding ether.
>
> Most of the time, the interaction of atoms with their surrounding
> ether probably is not noticeable because of lack of harmony
> or resonance, and their effects cancel each out. But get a
> bunch of atoms in some kind of sync with the ether, Watch Out!
>
> Gary Vesperman
> vman@skylink.net
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> ICQ # - 13175100 / AOL - Keelyman
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187