<P>Hexslinger wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>On Mon, 18 May 1998, Doug Renner wrote:
<P>> SHOCK WAVES of light are actually generated. These shock waves
are known as "Cerenkov
<BR>> Radiation" (also spelled Cherenkov.).
<P>Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly *IS* Cerenkov Radiation? Can you
<BR>provide any URLs to a decent explanation? (I mean, if it's possible
to
<BR>create FTL shockwaves in water - then there's probably more going on
there
<BR>than meets the eye - and hence - is worth exploration.)</BLOCKQUOTE>
Sure! It's fascinating stuff, but for some reason we hardly ever hear about
it. My College Physics text only contains one single sentence about
it!! But check these out:
<P><A HREF="http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~eww6n/physics/CerenkovRadiation.html"> Very
brief definition</A>
<P> <A HREF="http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~eww6n/physics/CerenkovRadiation.html">Longer
definition</A>
<P> <A HREF="http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~eww6n/physics/CerenkovRadiation.html">Much
longer definition</A>
<P> <A HREF="http://web.reed.edu/resources/reactor/cerenkov/cerenkov_jb.html">Beautiful
Photo showing blue glow of Cerenkov radiation surrounding submerged nuclear
reactor</A>
<P>"FTL" particles creating shock waves of light - it may be old news but
it's nonetheless very amazing stuff. These shock waves, or "Cerenkov
Radiation", are also the primary means of detecting neutrinos in our atmosphere.
It's a very underappreciated effect, IMHO.
<P>Regards,
<BR>-Doug Renner</HTML>
</x-html>.
Received: from ???@??? Wed May 20 01:19:01 1998
Return-Path: <KeelyNet-L-return-2492-danyork=iadfw.net@lists.kz>
Received: from lists.kz from [207.180.91.8] by mail.airmail.net
(/\##/\ Smail3.1.30.16 #30.237) with smtp for <danyork@iadfw.net> sender: <KeelyNet-L-return-2492-danyork=iadfw.net@lists.kz>
id <m0yc2A9-000BCYB@mail.airmail.net> Wed, 20 May 98 01:15:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 3717 invoked by alias); 20 May 1998 06:29:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact KeelyNet-L-help@lists.kz; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Delivered-To: mailing list KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Received: (qmail 3708 invoked from network); 20 May 1998 06:29:50 -0000
Received: from endeavor.flash.net (209.30.0.40)
by mail.starfire.douglas.ma.us with SMTP; 20 May 1998 06:29:50 -0000
Received: from dmdxojez (dasc5-247.flash.net [208.194.208.247])
by endeavor.flash.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA16342
for <KeelyNet-L@lists.kz> Wed, 20 May 1998 01:15:18 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <35627444.542A@keelynet.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 01:12:20 -0500
From: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>
Organization: KeelyNet
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Subject: Re: Virtual Sandtable
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980519225732.22263B-100000@users2.internet-frontier.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Hex et al!
Conspiracies? How are 'psychic healing' and 'crop circles' remotely
related to conspiracies??
A simple question about Chladni waveplates and how to image them via a
computer program isn't remotely related to a conspiracy.. It was simply
a question about how it could be done in software.
Nor is the anecdote that I wrote up which appears to be an antitime
phenomenon and which I've not seen yet, but which specifically referred
to what I would consider major physical damage that was reversed by some
odd process and recorded on video in lieu of just taking the witness'
word for it. I presented it only because it correlated with phenomena
that I think an understandig of negative entropy and thus antitime could
produce.
But your baby and bathwater dismissal of both of these innocuous posts
tied in to some bizarre link to conspiracies just makes no sense
whatsoever. Gee, guy, get a grip and make some positive contributions.
-- Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187