Re: LET ME ASK MY QUESTION AGAIN SO THAT IT MIGHT GET ANSWERED

Paul Brown ( (no email) )
Mon, 18 May 1998 10:31:16 -0600

William,

If the "autodynamic" theory suggests these things are possible: You are
addressing your question to the wrong people. Ask the author of the
autodynamic theory. I don't know anyone who subscribes to his theory which
has no basis in experiment.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: ufotruth@ix.netcom.com <ufotruth@ix.netcom.com>
To: geraldod@bellsouth.net <geraldod@bellsouth.net> KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
<KeelyNet-L@lists.kz>
Date: Sunday, May 17, 1998 11:36 PM
Subject: LET ME ASK MY QUESTION AGAIN SO THAT IT MIGHT GET ANSWERED

>Everyone,
>
>I am going to ask my question again. If you would please answer it I would
>greatly appreciate it. In this question lets simply assume that time
>dilation, mass increase, and space warping does not occur when one
>accelerates to and past the speed of light. Hey, you might think that I am
>wrong and that time dilation, mass increase, and/or space warping does
occur
>when one accelerates to and/or beyond the speed of light. But for this
>question please just THEORETICALLY assume that these SR and GR things do
not
>occur....
>
>So here is my question.
>
>How much fuel would it take for a conventional space craft (rocket or ion)
>to accelerate at a constant rate of speed to twice the speed of light? How
>much fuel would it take? Would it be possible to build such a craft?
>
>Please answer this question without discussing how it is impossible to
>travel FTL conventionally.
>
>Best Regards,
>William
>
>
>
>
>
>