Dave wrote:
> HI NORMAN!
>
> Ha, I did the same thing!
>
> Did you leave the signal on continuously for a couple of weeks?
>
> You will discover that the magnet gets weaker due to the Alternating
> Current DEGAUSSING effect, especially if you using high driving
> currents. Remember, frequencies are A.C.!
>
> Try using a single direction pulse and you will keep the dipole domains
> in alignment! Proper Driving Pulse Polarity is a must!
>
> Try a bar of mild steel (low carbon content) between 2 magnets with
> the wire wrapped around it for low frequencies. Use a ferrite core
> for greater than 50 KHZ experiments.
> <Dave>
> .......................................................................
> Norman Wootan wrote:
> >
> > Hi! Guy, I thought you passed away like all "free energy" researchers who suddenly
> > arise from the dead. Ha! Ha! Good to here from you again. Back on the "VTA" track
> > again,he!. From the recent post about currie point and bombarding magnets with 60hz
> > seems like you are not alone. Joel and I wound a loose coil (about 50 turns #18
> > ga copper) around a magnet. Apply a signal from a good sig gen and watch your scope
> > for the resonant point. Most magnets that we used would resonate at around 8Khz and
> > you could hear them physically sing a high freq note. That is the way we did it.
> > Different magnets would respond at varying freqs based on the material composition.
> > Most barrium/ferrite and strontium/ferrite would give the approximate 8khz
> > response. Go back to the old Keelynet BBS message base that Jerry has posted or is
> > going to post soon (messages #7500-11,000) and read how Joel and I verified the
> > widely discussed natural resonant freq of magnetism. Hans Coler had arrived at a
> > freq of 180khz. Tesla worked around 179khz with his big Colorado Springs coil
> > according to the Corum"s. We determined the freq to be 175.95khz. I gave Jerry
> > the old message base last night so give him a few days to sort it out and post it.
> > I know he is busy trying to get this site refined. Be gentle, for he is peddling as
> > fast as he can. Ha! Ha! Glad you are back and actively engaged in some research.
> > Norm
> >
> > Guy Resh wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all - I'm baaaaack...
> > >
> > > > Bill: Careful here for if you create standing waves at the natural resonant
> > > > freq of the crystaline lattice structure of the magnet material using three
> > > > octave relationship then you are applying "Keely-ese" and are backing into the
> > > > "MRA" technology for this is exactly how it worked. The MRA is a extremely
> > > > high "Q" device based on resonance in non-linear material. Norm
> > >
> > > Norm - can you point me to any reference material regarding exactly how one
> > > determines the natural resonant frequency for a given ceramic magnet? Assuming
> > > one has a multi-channel scope available, is it fairly "easy" to accomplish?
> > > For what it's worth, I'm back on the VTA-trail, having been out of "research
> > > mode" for the last year as I changed jobs, moved family to new state, etc.,
> > > and almost have my lab/workshop back in "working order".
> > >
> > > > Bill Perry wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > I think that one could create the required 60Hz frequency by beating two
> > > > > > frequencies together, at the right phase.
> > > > > Actually, (sorry to keep correcting myself), but ony ONE frequency would
> > > > > be required as long as it was 60Hz off of the actual resonant frequency
> > > > > of the medium. if its resonance was 30KHz, inject a strong 29940Hz or a
> > > > > 30060Hz signal and the standing wave left over would be 60Hz.
> > > > > BillP
> > >
> > > All for now...
> > >
> > > Guy Resh
> > > gresh@area51.fmr.com
>
> --
> *****************************************************************
> * "When a TRUE GENIUS APPEARS, you can know him by this sign: *
> * *
> * THAT ALL THE DUNCES ARE IN A CONFEDERACY AGAINST HIM!" *
> * ... Jonathan Swift *
> *****************************************************************