This was in response to an email about suppression...
------------------------
Well, despite all the claims, I don't think there is much to most of
these 'death threat' claims....such claims pop up when the inventor
fails to produce or is otherwise required to prove the claim....usually
propagated by the inventor, his followers or investors.
I have known several people who don't work, living off handouts or from
others who kindly allow them to live or use their property....these guys
are so devoted to their particular invention, they just lose all touch
with the realities and necessities of sustaining their own needs.
If they get into problems with taxes, creditors, the law or otherwise,
they use it as justification of harassment. IMHO, they create their own
hell and try to blame others, a common thing nowadays.
I fully expect an entire cult will spring up around Meyers death, it's
already started in the conspiracy circles.
As to Sweet, I never met the man, but I've known Tom Bearden for many
years, have met and talked with Walter Rosenthal and know Don Watson
very well, so they have been my main sources of information since they
worked with Sweet while he was living.
To tell you the truth, there probably are a few crazies out there who
would make threats which could easily and falsely attributed to
government or big business.
However, I think perhaps one in 200 claims of suppression might have
some organized basis. Most of these guys are so flaky, they don't have
sufficient credibility to be worthy of note by any 'organized' group.
I know for a fact that the conferences are in fact monitored by at least
one government agency, because I was approached by the DIA to work for
them (two of them, one whose name was Thompson at a Global Sciences
Congress about 1988).
This all happened when a group of about 9 of us were sitting at this
very big conference table and I was rattling off about something. David
Fasold had gone out of the room to get a beer and on returning, two men
were with him, white shirts, slacks, tie, baldheaded, one with glasses.
I thought they were friends of David (he is the fellow who found what
many of us believe to be Noah's Ark, well the bibical one as there were
apparently several arks from different cultures).
So these two guys sat near my end of the table and listened for a few
minutes, then this Thompson guy started asking questions about scalars
and general weirdness, to which I responded and said something about
quartz switches...he then told me about a Prof. Nunnelly at UTD who had
developed a quartz switching device that would put out tens of thousands
of simultaenous frequencies (like a spark gap transmitter) and with some
power.
He said Nunnelly, with one stroke, had completely obviated the entire
Stealth project (radar absorptive paint) and that he and his co-agent
were coming to Dallas to meet with Dr. Nunnelly and if I was interested
would be invited to join them. So we talked about that and other techie
things for awhile and the rest of the group seemed a bit lost.
Finally, he said how would I like to work for the DIA, I said I didn't
know what DIA stood for, he said Defense Intelligence Agency. I said
you have got to be kidding, he said no, he and his partner were there to
check out this particular alternative science conference, to see if
there was anything the government should know about.
He said it was rare to find anyone with any science comprehension at
such affairs and the DIA and other government agencies were always on
the lookout for people who could bridge metaphysical/alternative science
with formal science. He said there was also another couple of fellows
at this conference from the Navy intelligence group, but I don't recall
the name of the Navy agencies he gave.
I asked what would I be expected to do and he said, read, study, attend
conferences at government expense and report back to them in as much
detail, correlated with and IN known orthodox science terms so that
others could get a handle on what was being worked on or claimed.
It was quite incredible and made a lasting impression on me...however, I
laughed and declined as I knew that anything that I might learn, I would
never be allowed to talk about or get involved in because of the nature
of the job.
So, I know these alternative science conferences are at least monitored
and it follows that any inventor with some degree of credibility (a
working device or working from a theory to build such a device) would
probably be at least watched.
Some of us joked about one of these agenices knocking of a good majority
of 'players' by going to these conferences and mind-controlling the
bunch, or some other weirdness like bio-weapons, etc.. Like lambs to
slaughter and we come on our own...<g>...
Anyway, in my case, I've never experienced the least bit of threat or
innuendo, except from the unavoidable crazies who infest all aspects of
life.
The sooner all these inventors realize that the best protection is full
and free disclosure to as many people as you can, and copyright the
document so your name is associated with it wherever it goes, the sooner
we'll have working devices. This copyright, shareware approach will
bring the inventor all kinds of acclaim and I think, opportunities.
-- Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187