This is important because if the face was proven to be artifically made,
then it indicates other advanced technologies might exist. Rick
Monterverde posted this to vortex;
(here is the URL for the photos)
ttp://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/target/CYD1/index.html
Jed wrote:
> I just tuned into that web page. The three images (low, med and hi
> res) are all uniformly blacked out. There are no details at all.
> Larry: I hope you got a hi-res copy, because the original data is
> gone now.
>
> This message is emphatically *not* an April Fool joke. I begin to
> believe in >conspiracy theories.
>
> If anyone else tunes in and finds the images intact, I would
> appreciate a copy.
>
>- Jed
The raw images lack contrast.
I copied the high res image and pulled it up in Photoshop, and tweaked
the RGB levels curves until I could see the image. It's all there in
detail, and to me is clearly a natural landform. Now the processed
images are out, and are very close to what I got from Photoshop.
I also compared the new image to the older image, and using selection
outlines, I was able to selectively darken areas of the new image after
the manner of the old, to see where the shadows and high points
conspired in the old images to make it look so much like a face. One
Carlotto and the others they got right: there is a node of some sort in
the area of shadow that became the right eye (on our left looking at the
image), and the node makes it look like an eyeball. The 'teeth' aren't,
and the whole thing is just a worn down mesa or thrust-block or whatever
- you know what I mean if you actually know your geology.
Too bad, I really wanted it to be artificial.
- Rick Monteverde
-- Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187