By the way, they also reported on a accidental discovery by a student at
MIT
University, seems he was doing some type of experiment with pieces of
plastic of a certian type I can't recall at the moment. Anyway he
accidently spilled some sulpheric acid on it. It dried overnight and he
discovered his mistake the next day, but fortuantly he tested it and found
to his amazment that it had stored a powerful electrical charge......a
cheap plastic battery....
I wonder what happened to this?
Was it hushed up? Covered up? Or did the Goverment buy it up? I havn't seen
any rechargable plastic, cheap batteries on the market.
The Announcer on the TV show said to think of the possiblities, Lightweight
batteries for use in Electric automobiles. As the plastic held a charge far
greater than those in normal batteries and the weight differance would be
enormous.
Billy M. Williams
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking alliances like
underpants in a dryer without Cling Free.
----------
> From: Jerry W. Decker <jdecker@keelynet.com>
> To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
> Subject: Re: Gold
> Date: Saturday, March 14, 1998 9:22 PM
>
> Hi Billy et al!
>
> You wrote;
> > Tho when a person watches and mentally tries to make it come up heads
> > or tails more, the odds get very very screwy. There is no way to
> > effect the odds of the test other than on a mental level.
>
> A year or so ago, a study was done with baby chickens placed in a room
> with a robot that was simply a motor with microswitches so that if ran
> into anything, it would back up a few inches, rotate about 45 to 90
> degrees and drive forward.
>
> The path of this robot was monitored as it moved all by itself in a room
> and found to be completely random.
>
> When baby chicks were placed in the room in a small pen, the robot had a
> decided tendency to 'hang around' the chicks. I never saw the complete
> report on this experiment but it was something on the order of 70-80% of
> the robots travels would bring it as close to the chick pen as possible.
>
> Amazed the researchers and led them to thinking that inanimate objects
> are attracted for some reason to animate objects....there were other
> experiment done that gave similar weighted results when living bodies
> were introduced as opposed to non-living...
>
> I just thought your mention of the randomness studies was intriguing. I
> have two reports sent to me by a lady scientist friend at Princeton who
> is heavily involved in such research and the anomalies definitely
> indicate something strange is going on. Eventually they'll get it to
> techniques that people can learn so they can use the effect for
> themselves.
> --
> Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187