Re: Graduated Forcefalls

John Berry ( antigrav@ihug.co.nz )
Tue, 17 Feb 1998 19:26:44 +1300

<x-html><HTML>
&nbsp;

<P>Jerry W. Decker wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Hi John et al!

<P>Are you saying that somewhere I or someone else said that Aether CREATES
<BR>space?&nbsp; I don't recall saying that or reading it.&nbsp; That's
much to
<BR>profound for my ability to comprehend, though if you read Schappellers
<BR>definitions/claims at <A HREF="http://keelynet.com/gravity/searl3.htm">http://keelynet.com/gravity/searl3.htm</A>
;
<BR>&nbsp;
<BR>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, Hexslinger said
<BR><I>>As I understand it, the aether (being the very fabric of spacetime
-</I>
<BR><I>>spacetime itself) consists of various flows of scalar 'charge'.</I><I></I>

<P>But if the aether IS space it can't be IN space or have any spacial
qualities unless there is space in some form in which it may reside which
is different from the space it creates,
<BR>So you CAN have an aether that is space but it can't have any spacial
qualities (but that noted above), Or you can have an aether that is not
space but just sits in space.

<P>Or you can have multiple aethers.

<P>John Berry
<BR>&nbsp;
<BR>&nbsp;</HTML>
</x-html>.
Received: from ???@??? Mon Feb 16 22:42:38 1998
X-Persona: <IADFW Account>
Return-Path: <KeelyNet-L-return-948-danyork=iadfw.net@lists.kz>
Received: from lists.kz from [207.180.91.8] by mail.airmail.net
(/\##/\ Smail3.1.30.16 #30.237) with smtp for <danyork@iadfw.net>
id <m0y4esv-000CheB@mail.airmail.net> Mon, 16 Feb 98 22:43:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 12619 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 1998 04:54:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact KeelyNet-L-help@lists.kz; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Delivered-To: mailing list KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Received: (qmail 12610 invoked from network); 17 Feb 1998 04:54:34 -0000
Received: from endeavor.flash.net (209.30.0.40)
by mail.starfire.douglas.ma.us with SMTP; 17 Feb 1998 04:54:34 -0000
Received: from flash.net (dasc20-212.flash.net [209.30.116.212])
by endeavor.flash.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA04624
for <KeelyNet-L@lists.kz> Mon, 16 Feb 1998 22:43:28 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <34E93035.6A13@keelynet.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 22:37:41 -0800
From: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>
Organization: KeelyNet
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Subject: Re: Graduated Forcefalls
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980215215941.4773B-100000@users2.internet-frontier.net> <34E90D6B.4DE507E9@ihug.co.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi John et al!

You wrote;
> The aether cannot have any quality it it's self supports, so if the
> aether IS the fabric space time as you say, It cannot exist in time
> or space, it can't have a property it supports or in other words it
> can't support it's self.
> So your description on the nature of the aether seems self
> contradictory

I think the problem is with the term spacetime. Space is one thing.
Time is one thing. Spacetime is one thing. Time as it occurs in space
(where else could it occur, you ask? Perhaps HYPERspace, beyond space!)

Hyperspace as I understand it is where aether flows when it passes into
the neutral center of mass. The idea of a reciprocal, mirrored universe,
where push becomes pull gives an idea of the difference of hyperspace to
the space we reside in.

Keely said 'Time is gravity'. I agree with the statement. As aether
flows into matter, it produces the effect we call 'gravity' that results
in the effect we call 'weight'. We not only suck in aether to our mass
constituents be we are 'caught in the wind' of aether which flows into
the planet.

IMHO the flow of aether is variable depending on the characteristics of
the mass. Time is the way mass clocks or times the flow of aether into
it. The more aether that flows into mass, the greater the weight and the
faster the time associated with it. I think we will find that this
concept explains 'relativity' where our weight changes on another planet
as will the 'flow of time'.

I don't think this leads to negentropy where time can be reversed in all
cases, though there might be some exceptions. As far as I'm concerned,
the theory leads to many fascinating possibilities beyond just how
gravity can be controlled.

--                Jerry W. Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com          http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"       Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187