> That is not what I am saying, What I mean is that you can't have an aether support
> it's self e.g... an aether that does nothing but cause inertia can't have inertia
> that is supported by it's self (though it could have inertia supported by another
> aether) an aether that creates gravity can't have gravity it's self or one that
> exists in space can't create the space it is in.
Yes. So in other words - what you're saying is that the aether is a
paradox. Every effect in the aether has to be/had to be started by
something. That is what is sounds like you're saying... that the existance
of the aether is a paradox.
If that's NOT what you're saying, then perhaps you'd like to clean up your
speech so I can understand you? (Oh yeah, remember: time, gravity,
and inertia all come from electromagnetics. All energy comes from the
aether - and returns to it.)