Chris Gupta
>From: Flash@bahamas.net.bs
>Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 10:35:12 -0500 (EST)
>X-Sender: Flash@bahamas.net.bs (Unverified)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>To: 1001.453@EROLS.COM
>Subject: ELECTRO-MEDICINE: New Hope for the New Year
>
>January 1998
>
>
>Reply to: Flash@bahamas.net.bs
>
>
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>
>*************************
>EXTREMELY SMALL, SAFE AMOUNTS OF ELECTRICITY (A FEW
>THOUSANDTHS OF AN AMPERE) HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE BEYOND
>THE TOLERANCE LEVEL OF PATHOGENIC LIFE FORMS; AND HAVE
>BEEN PROVEN TO KILL OR DEVITALIZE HIV, HERPES,
>TUBERCULOSIS, HEPATITIS, COLDS, FLU, AND OTHER
>VIRUSES, FUNGI, PARASITES, AND BACTERIA IN BLOOD AND
>BODY FLUID RENDERING THEM INEFFECTIVE TO INFECT OR
>AFFECT NORMAL HEALTHY CELLS, WHILE MAINTAINING THE
>BIOLOGICAL USEFULNESS OF THE BLOOD AND OTHER BODY
>FLUIDS
>*************************
>
>DOCTORS AT ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE IN NEW YORK
>CITY HAVE PROVEN THAT MINUTE ELECTRICAL CURRENTS RENDER
>INEFFECTIVE ANY BACTERIUM, VIRUS, FUNGUS OR PARASITE
>WITHOUT HARM TO BLOOD OR BODY FLUID; THE DOCTORS REPORT
>THAT THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY USED IS NO MORE THAN TWO
>THOUSANDTHS OF AN AMPERE; HOWEVER, THEY WILL NOT BE
>PREPARED TO TEST 'IN VIVO' (I.E. IN THE BODY) TECHNIQUES
>FOR SEVERAL YEARS
>
>INDEPENDENT SCIENTISTS AND RESEARCHERS HAVE PROVEN HOWEVER,
>THAT 'IN VIVO' -IN THE BODY- ELECTROMEDICAL TECHNIQUES ARE
>NOT ONLY SAFE FOR HUMANS, BUT WORK QUITE THOROUGHLY ON
>SYSTEMIC INFECTIONS WITHOUT INVASIVE SURGICAL IMPLANTS OR
>EXPENSIVE HOSPITAL CARE
>***********************************
>
>Several recent U.S. and international patent documents
>report that extremely small amounts of electricity are
>beyond the tolerance level of microbial life. These
>electrical forces have been proven to kill or devitalize
>bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites in blood and body
>fluids without adverse effect to normal healthy cells
>and/or the biological usefulness of the blood or body
>fluids.
>
>U.S. patent 05188738 granted in 1993 and held by the Albert
>Einstein Medical Centre doctors mentioned above, describes
>an 'in vitro' (i.e. outside the body) apparatus for
>removing blood from one arm, electrifying it and returning
>it pathogen free to the other arm in a process similar to
>dialysis. The patent also describes a proposed 'in vivo'
>-in the body- technology as a surgically implanted, battery
>operated device similar to a heart pacemaker.
>
>Dr. Steven Kaali, one of the patent holders claims their
>'in vivo' -in the body- device will take years of testing
>before it is ready even though no harmful side effects or
>pathogenic mutation have been indicated. Critically-ill
>persons who have exhausted pharmaceutical therapies
>meanwhile fight for their lives without the knowledge that
>electromedical therapies exist and may very well help them.
>
>Scientists, MD's and individual researchers working
>independently report that their 'in vivo' -in the body-
>techniques are completely safe and highly effective.
>However, the United States' Food and Drug Administration
>(FDA) has issued warnings that they would be prosecuted for
>making any beneficial claims about the technology.
>
>The FDA and the American Medical Association (AMA) have put
>a strangle-hold on the efficacy and safety information
>gathered over recent years by numerous scientists,
>researchers and medical practitioners even though
>reportedly, AMAZING results have been achieved on humans
>with their 'in vivo' -in the body- techniques. The threat
>of jail and license suspension looms constantly over them
>as 'in vivo' human-testing has never been approved.
>
>According to scientist Bob Beck D.Sc. who has his doctorate
>in science and who is responsible for designing two simple
>'in vivo' blood electrification techniques, many HIV / Aids
>patients using his modalities have reached undetectable
>viral counts (as proven by Polymerase Chain Reaction -PCR-
>testing) at between 4-8 weeks of two hour per day therapy;
>still he says, he is constantly threatened by authorities.
>
>He is perhaps the most vocal critic of an alleged
>pharmaceutically-based conspiracy to cover up and discredit
>the electro-medical movement. Records indicate that in the
>1930's the Flexnor Report declared the use of electricity
>in medicine quackery; conveniently ushering in the new
>antibiotic "wonder-drug" age. At the time, 10,000 medical
>practitioners in America alone, believed in and practiced
>electro-medicine. They were forced to stop or loose their
>licenses to practice.
>
>In the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (a Hearst newspaper)
>article A Shocking Remedy written in 1993, the now
>principal investigator at Bastyr University Dr. Leanna
>Standish said "We're at a very exciting juncture in medical
>history, we're starting to look at the human organism as a
>bioelectric system, not just an anatomical structure. I
>think it's going to be some years before we know the full
>ramifications." Standish has her doctorate in Neuroscience.
>
>Modern practitioners were convinced even in 1993 that
>electricity could be a vital force in curing disease. They
>sensed that futuristic sounding applications such as
>reversal of spinal-cord injuries and cures for cancer and
>aids could be achieved by a new understanding of the body's
>electrical circuitry. This is not "new age" thinking as
>records from the 1st Century A.D. described the use of
>electric eels to relieve pain and cure illness.
>
>As recently as 1997, an Austrian Oncology Society
>conference 'Quantum Physics in Medicine, The Paradigm of
>the next Millennium' which was attended by German and
>Austrian cancer specialists, focused on the integration of
>bio-electric discoveries and conventional cancer
>therapies. The conference kicked off with a full
>introduction to the physics of electro-medicine and its
>benefits. The conference was a giant step forward in the
>integration of electro-medicine into conventional medicine.
>
>What was around the corner at the time of the Seattle
>Post-Intelligencer article (1993), may be here today. One
>bio-electric web site claims "only time will tell if daily,
>long term (90-120 day) electro-medical combination therapy
>has killed HIV infections completely (in effect curing the
>patients completely) or if intermittent treatments will be
>necessary to keep the infections at undetectable levels in
>brain, blood, body fluid, bone marrow and tissues." The
>attitude among all electro-medical researchers is entirely
>positive, they claim that approved or not, they have seen a
>remarkably small rate of failure.
>
>It is claimed by practitioners of electric-combination
>therapy, that even under the worst HIV scenarios, with
>viral counts over 1 million copies per ml and severe
>physical deterioration present, these synergistic therapies
>produce a sharp, nearly immediate drop in viral load with a
>corresponding rebound in immune system function.
>
>Another proponent took the stance that should HIV remain
>hidden away in places that are unreachable by
>electro-magnetics (in this case powerful electro-magnetic
>pulsing), being HIV or Hepatitis positive, may in the long
>run be more of an annoyance than a life threatening
>disease. They went on to say that with periodic self
>treatments the viruses should remain undetectable.
>Theoretically they say, viral levels would be so low with
>the electric combination therapies, that the patients may
>very well be proven to be non-contagious, though still
>technically HIV or Hepatitis positive.
>
>It is widely reported by practitioners, that certain
>electromedical therapies work quickly at greatly reducing
>the severity and frequency of herpes outbreaks; with some
>long-term chronic sufferers experiencing complete
>remission.
>
>A common thread among all electro-medical practitioners is
>that the treatments are completely safe and appear to
>stimulate the immune system, thereby heightening immune
>response to all invaders. So do electrical treatments kill
>off the diseases directly allowing the immune system to
>revive, or does heightened immune system response kill off
>the invading organisms?..they say it appears a mixture of
>both, although apparently no one really knows for sure, as
>yet.
>
>If in the end its found that electromedical therapies are
>proven superior over conventional pharmaceutically based
>therapies for microbial infections, we will certainly be
>headed for what can only be called a 'medical revolution';
>one which understandably will not be well received by the
>pharmaceutical industry.
>
>Two of the only books in print on the subject of
>electro-medicine are; The Cancer Cure That Worked: Fifty
>Years of Suppression: by Barry Lynes and Dr. Robert
>Becker's The Body Electric, they are both well written
>and researched. The first book by Lynes centers around the
>life of Raymond Rife and his electrical frequency "cure"
>for cancer. The therapy was tested thoroughly and
>successfully by the University of Southern California in
>the 1930's. The second, by Dr. Becker (he is a medical
>doctor in the U.S.) about the latest discoveries and use of
>electricity in medicine. Some of the uses like nerve, bone
>and limb regeneration, though sounding very futuristic,
>have actually been accomplished.
>
>The patent documents and books mentioned here as well as
>other medical discoveries claimed to be essential to better
>health (some substantiated by the Smithsonian Institution,
>University of Southern California, and University of
>California, Los Angeles Medical Centre) may be found at;
>
>http://www.bahamas.net.bs/neutralizer
>
>and
>
>http://www.bahamas.net.bs/electromedicine
>
>**********************
>Scientists can beat disease; politicians simply choose not
>to.
>*************
>
>By forwarding this to your friends and
>family you are helping create the
>awareness which is necessary to bring
>government funded research to these
>technologies.
>
Very Best Regards,
Bill
http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/2958/