Re: How about Mechanical Storage / Impulse Wave?

Bill McMurtry ( weber@powerup.com.au )
Tue, 10 Feb 1998 17:15:13 +1000

At 20:54 9/02/98 -0700, you wrote:
>How about Mechanical Storage / Impulse Wave?
>
>I've read and re-read K.D. Ewert's ideas. Am I missing something here?
>It appears he's found the missing link to Clem's engine, Orffyreus's
>wheel, and "Uncles Perpetual Motion Toy".
>
> Clem Engine
>http://www.keelynet.com/energy/clem1.htm
>
>http://www.keelynet.com/energy/clem2.htm
> Uncles Perpetual Motion Toy
>http://www.keelynet.com/energy/mptoy.htm
> Bessler/Orffyreus
>http://www.keelynet.com/energy/bessler.htm
>
>He claims impulse force can yield input power squared. The relationship
>between impulse forces is not [F1: F2] but [F1 : F2]^2. F1 is input
>power in the form of an 'impulse wave'. F2 is the resistive force of
>the mechanism. As I read it, F1 must be greater than F2 for overunity?
>
>Impulse force, F1, can be increased by either weight, speed or both.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/3664/kinetic.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/3664/kinexp.html
>
>He claims to have a device that produces up to %1000 eff.
>
>
>Your thoughts?
>
>Regards,
>Shane C Hall "Could be off the wall, but I'll hang there for a spell"

Hi Shane,

interesting note: one of the scientific examiners that witnessed Bessler's
large wheel commented on the loud impacts of the weights inside the wheel.
This examiner was of the opinion that the IMPACTING of the weights against
the inside rim (on the down side of the wheel) may well hold the secret of
the Bessler wheel.

Question: Why did Bessler design his wheel so that the weights had to
loudly whack the inside rim of the wheel?

One would imagine that if you were attempting to design such a wheel, using
conservative energy approaches, you would try to cut potential energy
losses, such as sound and (untuned) vibration, to a minimum. Bessler did
the opposite - he created a racket inside his wheels. WHY?

Bill.