Re: Letz Rock

Dr Jones ( maitland@icarus.ihug.co.nz )
Thu, 5 Feb 1998 23:13:20 +1300

At 03:04 5/02/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Dr. Jones!
>
>Now, now, don't chicken out, you wrote;
>> I can't win because Moray has already built a working device in
>> the 1930s. In any event it automatically breaches cl 2 because it
>> originates with Tesla or Moray, not Perrault.
>
>The terms can be modified but they still work as;
>>> 1) doesn't use known PREVIOUSLY published (by others) radioactive
>>> power generation experiments or results
>>> 2) is originated by him
>>> 3) if it does work, WILL only do so USING known methods of tapping
>>> radioactive elements to produce energy
>
>NO ONE has a working Moray device or design therefore his circuit is
>TOTALLY open to interpretation and design....so if anyone came up with a
>working device on the very, VERY tiny bit of information that is known
>about the Moray device, then hell, I'll be happy to pony up a
>case....

Okay, as long as we're talking about the spirit, not the exact legals and
infinite interpretation. Important to get that right at the start. But im
happy with that.
>
>I've heard the term 'desparate' applied to some who claim a working
>device, then it doesn't work, after they've gotten all this attention
>(which they LOVE), so they become DESPARATE to find something new that
>will draw interest back to them...in other words, claims BEGET
>claims...<g>...

Yeah, I read some of Beardens claims like that dating from 93/94. All full
of how he would change physics and write the New Science Textbooks. Fat
chance of that happening now.
>--
> Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
Dr Jones

I would write something long and impressive sounding or looking here if I
could or if I had the will or inclination or even something to say but
because I dont I wont bother and will quietly come to an end about here.