<P>Bruce A. Perreault wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Jerry W. Decker wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> Overunity is one of the reasons I'm here, what the list was created
for
<BR>> and what I'm hoping people can comprehend as one of three basic
<BR>> goals....all of which are clearly posted and which everyone is expected
<BR>> to have read prior to subscribing and to comply with.
<P>Perreault writes:
<P>"Over-unity" can not be achieved without a source of energy!</BLOCKQUOTE>
Sorry Perreault, You just hit a nerve.
<BR>Can you give me one reason as to why energy can't be created?
<BR>I know that it is <B>not</B> possible to prove the non-exestance of
the possibility of
<BR>creation of energy.
<BR>Just the fact that you have not seen it happen nor can conceve of how
it could
<BR>in no way reflects on the possibilityof it.
<BR>
<P>John Berry</HTML>
</x-html>.
Received: from ???@??? Mon Jan 26 08:50:57 1998
X-Persona: <IADFW Account>
Return-Path: <KeelyNet-L-return-329-danyork=iadfw.net@lists.kz>
Received: from lists.kz from [207.180.91.8] by mail.airmail.net
(/\##/\ Smail3.1.30.16 #30.233) with smtp for <danyork@iadfw.net>
id <m0xwpqB-0007ndB@mail.airmail.net> Mon, 26 Jan 98 08:48:47 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 32160 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 1998 14:53:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact KeelyNet-L-help@lists.kz; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Delivered-To: mailing list KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Received: (qmail 32148 invoked from network); 26 Jan 1998 14:53:46 -0000
Received: from cyberport.cyberportal.net (root@204.97.234.4)
by mail.starfire.douglas.ma.us with SMTP; 26 Jan 1998 14:53:46 -0000
Received: from bruceperreault.cyberportal.net (plym2-pool-27.cyberportal.net [208.0.180.97])
by cyberport.cyberportal.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA02404
for <KeelyNet-L@lists.kz> Mon, 26 Jan 1998 09:43:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <34CCA0DA.1AA4@cyberportal.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 09:42:34 -0500
From: "Bruce A. Perreault" <nuenergy@cyberportal.net>
Organization: International Society for Integrated Science (ISIS)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Subject: Re: Earth Energy Taps
References: <01bd2a67$e7a39f20$a757accf@wizzard>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ken,
500Khz. is storm frequency.
I would also like to point out that light-bulbs were not used,
carbo-arc lamps were used.
-ISIS
Kenneth Carrigan wrote:
>
> Jer,
>
> I was thinking, for some reason, 5 -60W bulbs. Hey, maybe
> the guy that wrote this up also screwed up and made it 50?
>
> Well, anyway, I'm trying to save you a little $ in the 1/2 to 1 mile
> of copper wire. Not to mention the 500W 100,000 volt source.
>
> Here's some more physics and engineering to assess your
> design/theory before you experiment. A wire 1/2 mile long
> at 500kHz is concidered a 'long wire antenna'. The Army used
> this design easy in the 1900's, not sure they do today. The
> design you mention places the input impedance at 20 meg ohms.
> The long wire antenna varies but lets say 400ohms worst case.
> That would mean at 500W input to this antenna, the voltage
> would not be greater than 450 at 500kHz.
>
> I'd investigate this a little more, by picking up a HAM book on
> some antenna theory and checking it out. Hey, maybe we
> can talk to each other around the world on 500kHz?
>
> This design just does not make sense - based on known designs
> that exist using the same principles and materials.
>
> v/r Ken Carrigan