I'm happy to see that someone is being honest.
If I ever get my T. H. Moray technology refined and made
into a suitable product I plan to follow the enclosed post
to the letter. I am in the process now of going through the
steps. However, I can not do this with just air!
I have been scolded by some folks in our circle for charging
a small fee for my research data. Selling this material has
given me a couple of extra dollars to bring a product to market.
A few dollars goes a long way for a guy like me of limited funding.
If anyone should be ragged on it is those University people that
siphon (steal) millions of dollars from the taxpayer on useless
projects. Every year I look in what the DOE has giving out in grant
money for various energy related projects. Year after year I see the
same damned projects. After 10 years you would think that these projects
give something back to the taxpayer but they do not. What I could do
with
those two hundred and fifty thousand dollar grants!
Do you know what my research budget is? If I'm lucky $1.000.00 per year,
75% of this coming out of my own pocket. Add this up over 15 years and
you
do the figuring.
So, if I do not give out my technology for "free," with no strings
attached,
forgive me, the world does not is not a free place, I can not leave off
my ego...
-ISIS
>
> hexslngr@internet-frontier.net wrote:
>
> Putting machines on the market is not ALWAYS the way to success, Jerry.
> Take my angle, for example. I'm interested in Keely's works for three
> reasons, really (hehehe - there's that number again):
> 1) Pure curiousity
> 2) Gimme an E, gimme a G, gimme an O - what's that spell? E-G-O!! :)
> 3) $$$
> However, I've noticed that most people seem focused purely on the $$$
> reason. Nothing wrong with that - it's just that people here have it all
> wrong. Take some advice: you'll *NEVER* succeed in marketing free energy
> devices, simply because of the fact that you'll be competing DIRECTLY
> against so many established economic forces that once they get wind of
> you, you'll be stomped out of business. Period.
>
> Thus, if you really want to succeed at Free Energy -- you have to find new
> ways to tackle the problem of distributing your product. There's several
> ways you could deal with this:
> 1) DECENTRALIZE the sales process; don't rely on market-recognition --
> rely instead on the utility of the product to make your sales. Distribute
> the goods to trusted distributors and local vendors to produce and sell
> these devices, and then reap fat royalties off their sales.
>
> 2) Give it all away free and let everyone build it themselves (pfff...
> yea, right)
>
> 3) DON'T sell your technology; instead, use it to gain an advantage over
> the competition in an unrelated industry. (For instance, use such
> technology on the MANUFACTURING side of a company so that you can provide
> your own raw materials FREE, and thus, be able to totally STOMP your
> competition -- and since they have no way of knowing you're using such
> technology, they won't use strongarm tactics to put you out of business --
> hence, you can silently kill the competition). [Presumably you'd later
> turn around, after the competition is gone, and deliver all that wonderful
> free-energy technology to the public.]
>
> Damnit, Jerry -- see what you made do! Went off on a tangent again.
> Oh well. :) However, it *IS* important that everyone present understand
> the economic impact that free energy and high technology has upon society.
> Better understanding of these principles will lead to the development of
> better marketing strategies -- and hopefully to the eventual success of
> SOMEONE out there in delivering free energy to the people.