Re: Gravity does NOT suck

Jerry W. Decker ( hexslngr@internet-frontier.net )
Fri, 23 Jan 1998 21:02:38 -0800 (PST)

On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Jerry W. Decker wrote:

> Ah, the SIGNATURE of the mass, of the COMPOUND aggregates, now you're
> getting technical....well, you know the spook way is radionics, using the
> body as the ultimately perfect all frequency antenna system and the mind
> as the tuning device to match, thus resonate with this compound mass
> signature....only problem, repeatability, mostly because it is subject to
> the operators emotions and even physical state at the time....

bOING! Right, however - that's why I wanted to use conventional
instruments (the mind is such a fickle thing -- while it may or may not be
the most perfect antenna system in the world, in the course of the brain's
operation it generates enough waves of it's own to seriously skew results
- as you more or less eluded to).

> However, there is another can of worms with this subject...man, you are a
> real troublemaker,.....<g>...

I'm the troublemaker?! Sure thing, oh master of going off on a tangent. 8)

(*BIG* snip)

There. Now as for the idea of the 'virtual high' (look out - I'm about to
go out on a newage tangent <g>), doesn't that remind you a LOT of
so-called simsense chips (if you've ever played any so-called 'cyberpunk'
role-playing games - you already know what I'm talking about -- if not,
just imagine a chip which can be hooked up to the mind to provide direct
sensory stimulation - as well as provide chemical stimulation as well).

Anyway -- virtual drugs... hehehe... somehow I don't think the Cocaine
Import Agency would like that. :P