Newest test on the 90% Eff. Lighting Circuit

 
courtesy of Wesley Crosiar 

From: WESLY

To: freenrg-l@eskimo.com

Subject: Re: High efficiency lighting system

Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:08:06 -0700

--------------------

TO ALL:



I purchased the high efficiency lighting system detailed in

Popular Electronics. I have just finished my testing of the device.



On the cold wire, before the electrical converter box we placed a

one Ohm resistor. Across this resistor we placed the scope.



There was a seventy volt spike at approximately 1/60th of a [cycle].



1/60th of a [cycle] times [1/10]cycle is approximately

1/600th of a second or approximately 1.66 milli/sec.



L=1/10th cycle in width + or - 10%



16,666 mil/sec + or - 10% divide by ten = 1.66MS



V=I amp times R



Seven volts over 1 ohm = 7amps spike @ 115V AC 60HZ

or approximately a 700 watt spike + or - 10%

for 1/10th of the cycle, which would be

70 watts + or - 10% at 60HZ.



I then compared the light to a standard one hundred watt light with

a light meter.



The results were that the 100 watt bulb was brighter than the light

from the bulb in the high efficiency lighting system that is supposed

to equal a 100 watt lightbulb, although it was more than a fifty watt

light bulb.



By using a light meter I found that this high efficiency lighting

system really put out only seventy five watts.



At this point I assumed that the High efficiency lighting system must

fool the Power companies meter, so I hooked it up to a regular house

meter.



Here are the results.



The high efficiency electrical system that had a lamp that is supposed

to put out 100 watts but actually only puts out seventy to seventy

five watts, spins the meter exactly the same speed as a normal seventy

five watt, one hundred and ten volt bulb does. This test was done with

a stop watch and a regular Pacific Gas and Electric power meter.



My conclusions: Mr. Rosenthal's device is a fraud. He makes the claim

that his device uses seven watts of electrical energy to produce one

hundred watts of light. This message can be forwarded to vortex-L or

Newmans list or anywhere else anyone wishes to save anyone else from

being duped by fraud.



WESLEY CROSIAR

PO BOX 268

SAN ANDREAS CA. 95642

-----------------------------------------------------

I should have proofread the earlier post, 1/60th of a "second" should

have read 1/60th of a [Cycle].



To make it more clear It should have read something like One HZ,

which is 1/60th of 60 Hz times 1/10th of a HZ

[the duration of the spike] = one 600th of a second or 1.66 Mill/Sec.